Examination malpractice and ACT 33 of 1999

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/2849

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Onuka, A. O. U	-
dc.contributor.author	Amoo, S. A.	-
dc.date.accessioned	2018-10-17T09:13:17Z	-
dc.date.available	2018-10-17T09:13:17Z	-
dc.date.issued	2004	-
dc.identifier.issn	0795-3607	-
dc.identifier.other	Nigerian Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation 5(1)	-
dc.identifier.other	ui_art_onuka_examination_2004	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/2849	-
dc.description.abstract	Examination as generally observed provoke anxiety in students. Anxiety could either be positive or negetive. The anxiety generated in students due to examination is a reflection of the effect of failure or otherwise in public examinations at the end of prescribed courses of study and this depends on how prepared such students are. In this paper, the issues of examination malpractice form the background of discussions. The paper reports the trends of examination malpractice and assesses the Act 33 of 1999 and its implications on examination malpractice. Relevant suggestions relating to implementation of the Act were made. These include strict application of the prescribed penalties on offenders by creating the enabling environment for the full implementation of the act as well as educating the various stakeholders on its essence in order to reduce such offences.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.title	Examination malpractice and ACT 33 of 1999	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US
Appears in Collections:	Scholarly works

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
[48] ui_art_onuka_examination_2004.pdf		6.49 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

UISpace