Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/5530
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLayiwola, D.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-24T14:00:59Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-24T14:00:59Z-
dc.date.issued1998-11-
dc.identifier.otherui_art_layiwola_subject-object_1998-
dc.identifier.otherAfrican Study Monographs, 19(3) , November 1998. Pp. 149-160-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/5530-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the subjecet versus object mode of relationship in articulating conclusions and generalizations across gender bias in three culture-specific novels of West Africa. Two of the selected novels are written by women about women. The third, a sociological novel, is by a sympathetic male writer. Because two of the novels can be regarded as sociological works, a sociological model in literary criticism—Lucien Goldmann’s ‘Genetic Structuralism’— is adopted as the analytical methodology: Events and characters can be examined as subject or object. To reach a fair analysis, the roles must be reversed so that conclusions and judgments can be compared. By so doing, bias and prejudice will be revealed if conclusions have been unfair. This will therefore make for a more realistic portraiture in art and help toward more objective development of literary criticism in the area of gender studiesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectSubject-Object divideen_US
dc.subjectColonialismen_US
dc.subjectWomanisten_US
dc.subjectMonogamyen_US
dc.subjectPolygamyen_US
dc.subjectGenetic structuralismen_US
dc.titleThe subject-object imperative: women and the colonial struggle in three West African novelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
(46)ui_art_layiwola_subject-object_1998.pdf4.02 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in UISpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.