Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/7999
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIdowu, O. S.-
dc.contributor.authorBabalobi, O. O.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-28T12:56:02Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-28T12:56:02Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn0331-3026-
dc.identifier.otherui_art_idowu_animal_2010-
dc.identifier.otherNigerian Veterinary Journal 31(1), pp. 26-36-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/7999-
dc.description.abstractA case study of a typical community based rural livestock production system in South-west Nigeria was undertaken using participatory epizootiology (PE) to understand local preferences for animal health management practices and observe if there is any justification or place for community based animal health workers (CBAHW ) in rural livestock health and production management. Sheep and goats were the major animals kept by 46.7% of the respondents, followed by chicken (29.3%), dogs (13.3%), ducks (8.0%) and pigs (2.7%). The major health and production problems identified were Pestes des petit ruminants (PPR) (30.0% of respondents), mange (23.0%) and crop destruction (20.0%); while cannibalism by hawks/eagle was the major problem of poultry production as highlighted by rural women (15%). While more respondents (42.7%) rate modern animal health practitioners as more effective than Fulani pastoralists healers (33.67%) and indigenous local healers (25.0%), modern animal health practitioners were described as least truthful/ unreliable (91.7%), less available (91.7%), most expensive (66.7%) and inaccessible (25.0%). On the other hand, indigenous local healers were rated as very available and more accessible (66.7%) while Fulani pastoralist healers were rated as more available and ready to provide veterinary services (58.3%) compared to indigenous local healers (33.3%) and modern animal health practitioners (8.3%). These results are similar to those obtained in other African countries. In conclusion, despite the prevailing professional apathy to the CBAHW concept by influential veterinary authorities in Nigeria, health issues highlighted by the community-based rural livestock farmers could be adequately addressed by CBAHW.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectRural communitiesen_US
dc.subjectAnimal healthen_US
dc.subjectFarmers’ perspectivesen_US
dc.titleAnimal health management perspectives of rural livestock farmers in Southwest Nigeria: the place of community based animal health workersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:scholarly works

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
(38) ui_art_idowu_animal_2010.pdf750.37 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in UISpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.